2. Is your
brainstorming getting the action you want?
I got disgusted with trash-TV and went to Border's
Books for coffee and reading. I bought an awesome book called,
"Magical Worlds of the Wizard of Ads," by Roy H. Williams.
Roy has written several "Wizard" books, which I
will read in time. This book has 101 chapters - but usually each
chapter has just two easy-to-read pages. Each chapter is a gem.
Here's a quotation from his chapter called, How to Facilitate
Brainstorming.
"Extraverts invented brainstorming. Stimulated by
things external to them, extraverts 'talk to think.' ...more than
half of our population are introverted [who] 'think to talk.'
...preferring to tell you only what they have already thought about.
Consequently, introverts typically sit quietly through brainstorming
sessions...
"...To have an awesome brainstorming session, just
send everyone a detailed note twenty-four hours ahead. ...
Extraverts will see the note only as an invitation... introverts
will interpret the note as a work assignment and begin formulating
thoughts..."
3. Are you starting your new employees the right
way?
Here's another quotation from Roy's chapter
called, Experience Must First Be A Verb.
"During the first hour of their first day on the
job, my friend Richard Kessler tells every new employee:
'When you're helping a customer of this company,
always remember that you ARE the company. When a decision needs to
be made, make it. Do what you believe is right. Nine times out of
ten, you're going to make a fabulous decision. One time in ten, I'm
going to wish that you had done something different. Backing you up
on those decisions is the price that I'm willing to pay to get the
other nine decisions from you. Never, ever be afraid to do what you
truly believe is right.'"
(No, I don't earn a commission or win a microwave
oven when you buy a book!)
You can subscribe to Roy's excellent weekly email
newsletter at:
http://www.wizardofads.com
4. Are you maintaining your documentation
correctly?
As I've said in many eZines, you must write stuff
down.
The other day, an interviewer asked,
"How many pages have you written?"
"Somewhere around 30,000 pages delivered, not
including thousands of draft pages."
"You must love writing!"
"Not really."
"Then what...?"
"I don't love writing per se. I love the
applications. I love the results. In writing, you can create, let's
say, the first level of reality. By writing, you can begin to give
intangible ideas form in the physical universe.
"Can you imagine how many people discovered the
secret of fire and didn't write it down? The news had to spread by
'tribal knowledge!'
"How many times did the secret vanish because some
fire-novice asphyxiated himself and family? How many times do think
some do-gooder banned fire due to its dangers?
"It probably took eons to discover that secret -
over and over!
"Eventually, I suppose, someone wrote the secret
on a cave wall or cocktail napkin..."
"Planning to write is not writing. Outlining...
researching... talking to people about what you're doing, none of
that is writing. Writing is writing." -- E.L. Doctorow
Anyway, when you write stuff down, you'll
eventually need to update it. (I'll talk here about large, important
documents - Operations Manuals, Technical Manuals, User Manuals, or
maybe the secret of fire and how to control it.)
"Mike, what have you learned over the years about
maintaining documentation?"
Well, large documentation projects have their own
"life cycle." This cycle extends from conception to obsolescence.
When you develop large-scale documents, you'll
typically iterate through the following:
1. Requirements. Includes definition, statement of
goals, preliminary analysis, functional specifications, and design
constraints.
2. Design. Includes outline definition, format
definition, etc.
3. Implementation. Requires writing, editing,
integration of various components, and proofing.
4. Testing. Includes verification and evaluation
against the requirements.
But wait! There's another phase I call
Documentation Maintenance! It begins after you deliver your
documentation to your user.
You can divide Documentation Maintenance into the
following steps:
- Determine need for change
- Submit Change Request
- Review Proposed Changes
- Analyze requirements
- Approve/Reject Change Request
- Schedule task(s)
- Review and Analyze Design
- Write and Edit
- Test
- Verify against Standards
- User Acceptance
In these steps, I outline the maintenance process,
which begins when someone needs a change and ends when your user
accepts your changes.
As you can imagine, changing documentation is
frequently complex and may involve many people.
For example, imagine the task of updating
documentation for applications in complex electronics, aerospace,
law, medical, insurance, etc. Or, how about updating flight-prep
manual for a commercial airliner?
The maintenance process above appears linear. But
again, you'll undergo many steps and iterative loops.
For example,
You may need to clarify the Change Request.
You may require more analysis of the Design Reviews.
You may need to rewrite your Standards Audit.
Your users may fail to accept the results, etc.
Someone, the "Maintainer(s)" must do the work.
This Maintainer must make changes within the
context of the existing documentation. Maintenance people often find
this the most challenging problem.
The older the documentation, the more challenging
and time-consuming the maintenance effort. But normally, maintenance
takes you less time than development.
Your development effort may span several months.
You may schedule PERFECTIVE maintenance in cycles of one to six
months. But, you may require CORRECTIVE maintenance within hours.
Functionally, you can divide documentation
maintenance activities into three categories:
PERFECTIVE,
ADAPTIVE, and
CORRECTIVE.
Let me explain...
PERFECTIVE MAINTENANCE
"Perfective maintenance" is when you make changes,
insertions, deletions, modifications, extensions, and enhancements
to improve understandability or maintainability.
You generally do Perfective maintenance because
you have new or changing requirements, or you may need to fine-tune
the documentation.
Fine-tuning is an excellent way to introduce a new
writer to your documentation. This will reduce your chance of
serious errors later.
Both failures and successes of your documentation
require Perfective maintenance. If your documentation works well,
users want more features; if your documentation works poorly, you
must fix it.
When you perform Perfective maintenance on poorly
written documentation, you can dramatically reduce resource
requirements by making your documentation more maintainable.
ADAPTIVE MAINTENANCE
"Adaptive Maintenance" is when you adapt the
documentation to changes in the user environment. Environmental
changes are normally beyond control of the writer and consist mainly
of changes to:
Rules, laws, and regulations that affect the
documentation. Typically you must quickly make these changes to meet
dates established by the rules and regulations.
Equipment configurations, such as, new computers,
new terminals, local printers, etc. Usually, you want to take
advantage of improved features and/or pricing. You normally perform
this maintenance on a scheduled basis.
Data formats, file structures, etc. You may
require extensive maintenance if these items were not properly
designed and implemented. If you can isolate changes to specific
modules, the maintenance may have less impact. If not, the effort
can be both lengthy and costly.
System software, operating systems, compilers,
utilities, etc. In these cases, you usually perform maintenance on a
schedule.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE
"Corrective Maintenance" is when you must fix
errors - sometimes immediately.
Generally, you'll find three types of errors:
Design errors.
These errors include incomplete or faulty design
because of incorrect, incomplete, or unclear descriptions, or when
the writer does not fully understand the user's needs.
Logic errors.
Often, logic errors occur when user instructions
and/or unusual data combinations are not tested during development
or maintenance. These errors, usually attributable to the designer
or previous maintainer, include invalid assumptions, tests,
instructions, or conclusions, or faulty logic flow, and incorrect
implementation.
Writing Errors.
The writer causes these errors. These errors
include incorrect implementation or design logic, or incorrect use
of special terms. While these errors may be the result of negligence
or carelessness, they are usually the easiest to fix.
NOTE: Many managers consider maintenance to
include changing specifications or adding new capabilities.
Fascinating stuff, eh?
5. Call to Action
As I've said before, I'm a fanatic about
documenting business processes.
Find out for yourself! You have nothing to lose.
Together, let's document what you want, how you
want it, and when you want it. We will discuss various creative
approaches before the project begins.
(c) 2003 Mike Hayden, All rights reserved. You may
use material from the Profitable Venture Tactics eZine in whole or
in part, as long as you include complete attribution, including live
website link and email link.